Home Page

Fr Aidan Nichols

Home Page

Epiphany : a theological introduction to Catholicism

by Aidan Nichols O.P.

Chapter 9: The Rites of the Church
Part 3

In the Greek practice, the priest questions the sinner about his sins; in the Slavonic, as in the Latin, the penitent takes the initiative in confessing as he or she desires. Absolution is given "deprecatively" (in a prayer form) in the Greek usage, both deprecatively and "declaratively" (in the form of an assertion) in the Slavonic. Thus the Greek celebrant prays:

May God who pardoned David through Nathan the prophet when he. confessed his sins, and Peter weeping bitterly for his denial and the sinful woman weeping at his feet and the publican and the prodigal son, may that same God forgive you all things, through me a sinner, both in this world and in the world to come, and set you uncondemned before his awesome judgement seat. Have no further care for the sins you have confessed; depart in peace.      

And the Slavonic both prays and affirms:

May our Lord and God Jesus Christ, through the grace and bounties of his love towards mankind, forgive you, my child, all your transgressions. And I an unworthy priest, through the power given me by him, forgive and absolve you from all your sins. In the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen.

In each case the rite ends with reference to the communion of saints in which both priest and penitent are incorporated, thanks to the character of the philanthropic Lord of the Church.

"May Christ our true God through the prayers of his most holy Mother and of all the saints, have mercy upon us and save us, for he is gracious and loves mankind."

From ancient times it was customary to ask for the prayers of confessors, just as the entire congregation would pray for the public penitents, offering them the suffragium ecclesiae, the Church's "suffrage" or "kind assistance." (The "confessors" here the accent is placed on the second syllable are those who have suffered for the faith. The principle of coinherence immanent in the communion of saints suggests that the closer members of the Church are to God, the deeper their charity, the more they can help their fellows.) The intervention of such holy confessors was taken, then, as justifying a diminution in the time of penance imposed by the Church in view of the sinner's reconciliation with her, and with God.

The first recognizably modern indulgences (i.e., those which correspond in evident form to the present practice of Catholicism) come from the south of France of the eleventh century. There, associated with almsgiving, or a pious visit to the sanctuary, we find the Church making an authoritative intervention, in the name of the communion of saints, in favor of her penitents. Such intercession is also found in the ante-Liturgy of the Eucharist, expressed in the old Latin prayers Misereatur and (significantly) Indulgentiam. The point of the intervention was to grant penitents a remission of the ecclesial penance due, signifying thereby the Church's role as corporate intercessor on their behalf before God. Such remissions derived from the commutation of a period of penance between confession and absolution, but as those two moments were increasingly united in a single rite, the remissions of penance were equally increasingly separated from the sacrament itself. This provided the sphere in which indulgences could operate. In 1215 the Fourth Lateran Council thought if proper to inveigh against "indiscreet and superfluous indulgences," and it was no doubt to avoid their trivialization that thirteenth-century sources insist explicitly that the recipient of an indulgence must be "rightly contrite and confessed." From the thirteenth century on, we find indulgences directed to the faithful departed, on the ground that even among them the power of the keys can operate, though only "deprecatively," per modum suffragei. The temporal penalty that both satisfaction and indulgence are said to remit is, then, both the penance imposed by the Church as discipline and the consequences of sin even after a sinner's conversion in depth. Indulgences exemplify how the Church's role towards sinners extends beyond the confessional: these acts of devotion or gestures of charity or exercises of penitence (all these descriptions can serve here) help relate to sacramental penance the daily penitence called for from the Christian. We should note that there is nothing magical about indulgences; the actualization of the remission which the Church accords depends on the degree of faith, the depth of devotion, and the fervor of charity which the recipient can muster: these are the basis for all union with Christ and his Church.

5. Anointing of the Sick

The reconciling work of Jesus Christ can also be regarded as a healing work. In both cases, the empirical facts getting Pharisee and tax-collector to sit down together, curing Simon's mother-in-law always have a parabolic significance. They are not done simply for their own sake, although for their own sake they were worth doing. In such reconciliations and healings in the gospel tradition there is a super-plus, since, as their handing on in the preaching and liturgy of the early Church demonstrates, they are meant to be pointers to a larger reconciliation and healing, that by which Jesus was affirmed as Savior of the whole human race. The evangelists, and notably John, are concerned to underscore this point vis-à-vis those who were satisfied with enjoying the material benefits of signs and wonders. The New Testament basis of the sacrament of the anointing of the sick lies in the Synoptic accounts of the Lord's commissioning of the Twelve for a work of healing, as that is further interpreted in the Letter of James (5:13-16), where the prayer of the Church and anointing with oil by presbyters (the delegated local form of the ministry) are said to "raise up" sick persons and "save" them. Here we have the sacramental instrument of apostolic healing. In the original Greek, both of these "doing-words" are ambivalent in meaning, hovering between physical healing and final salvation the reconciliation of the whole person with himself, with others, and with God in a definitive fashion.

The shape of the sacrament is already clear. In the language of later analysis, the matter is anointing with (olive) oil, the form a prayer formula determined by the Church. Oil is a food marvelously suited to a ritual of healing, at once a soothing ointment and, in the Arabic proverb, the father of muscle. In Scripture oil connotes consolation, joy, peace, and gladness flowing from God's own abundance and toward human wholeness in him. Perfumed oil, in Jewish tradition, is not only this-worldly in its symbolic resonance, for it brings to mind the "oil of paradise," the restoring of life to the elect at the judgment. The form found in the present Latin Rite has the priest pray,

"Through this holy anointing, may the Lord in his love and mercy help you with the grace of the Holy Spirit, Amen. May the Lord who frees you from sin save you and raise you up, Amen."

In the age of the Fathers, Christians saw anointing as, in Caesarius of Arles's phrase, medicina Ecclesiae, "the Church's physic." But soon the sense unfolded that this physical healing was ordered to, and therefore subordinate to, spiritual well-being. The shift of emphasis can be documented in the prayers of blessing the oil of the sick on Holy Thursday between, for instance, the words "ad refectionem corporis" in the Gregorian Sacramentary and the more comprehensive "ad refectionem mentis et corporis" in its Gelasian counterpart. So a more holistic sense of what Christian healing might be gained ground, though never to the complete exclusion of the idea that actual physical recovery was a possible effect of this sacrament. The very primitive Sacramentary of Serapion, an Egyptian prayer book, has:

We invoke you, who have all authority and power, Saviour of all men, Father of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, and we pray that you may send forth the power of healing from heaven of your only begotten Son over this oil, so that to those, who are anointed by these your creatures . . . this oil may be used in riddance of any weakness and of any infirmity, in remedy against the Devil, in the expulsion of any unclean spirit, in the detachment of worthless preoccupation, in the cure of fever, of cold, and of physical weakness; let it be a channel of good grace and of remission of sins, a source of life and health, an instrument for the well­being and wholesomeness of the soul, body and spirit; thus perfect health may be restored.

Aquinas, in his commentary on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, considers that the sacrament was instituted to provide for spiritual enfeeblement, itself provoked by sin (both original and personal) and aggravated by the demoralizing effects of illness. Such enfeeblement would hinder a sick person from carrying out those acts of faith, hope, and charity that bring about in us the life of grace and glory. Subsequently, the Council of Trent produced on this subject one of its most balanced summings-up of the earlier tradition. The Fathers of Trent distinguished between the habitual and the merely occasional effects of anointing. The first consists in the grace of the Holy Spirit relieving and strengthening spiritually the sick person. In every case, Christ does this work in this sacrament (unless we, the receiving subjects, prevent him). The second category entails pardon and healing. These are not, however, different graces from the first, but the same grace insofar as in particular cases sacramental grace, in order to procure its proper (habitual) effect, must either purify the subject from his sins, or give him physical healing, or both. In other words, there may well be cases where a return to physical health is the fruit of this sacrament. It may be in God's will that a person comes to spiritual health by way of physical.

Anointing, then, maintains and strengthens communion with God and with others at times when that unity is compromised by the debilitating effects of sickness and old age. The tendency of the sick body to become an alien object to the mind is corrected by the grace of the Spirit of Christ. Similarly, the tendency of suffering to make me exclusively attentive to myself and to dislocate my relations with others is rectified by that Spirit, and the anguish of illness, prompted by the experience of finitude and mortality, is also healed as the sacrament enables me to accept the fact that I shall (eventually) die and to accept that fact in a manner both creative and sacrificial, which makes a death a way to God. In this regard, anointing welcomes the Christian into the mystery manifested in the Lord's person as priest and victim.

In the early modem period, and indeed until earlier this century, when grave illnesses were usually short and death-dealing, this sacrament was rarely conferred more than once, thus justifying the name "extreme unction" (the "last anointing"). However, the authors of the Catechism of the Council of Trent considered it gravely wrong to

"defer holy unction until, all hope of recovery being lost, life begins to ebb and the sick person is fast verging into a state of insensibility."[33]

Because of the progress of curative and preventive therapy and surgical technique, some illnesses can be prolonged or even permanent states, so that, paradoxically, the development of medicine has produced more sick people. In a period when many people, having been anointed, will live on and even recover, unction has generally ceased to be "extreme." Where it is not, then, praeparatio ad gloriam, part of the last rites, and in those cases where it does not entail cure, what it signifies is the task offered to the sick person under grace. That task is the preservation of a new sense of meaning which the crisis of sickness has created when believers affirm that only the life of the age to come will bring them the total fulfillment they desire. The sick are to pass, with Christ's help, from physical weakness to spiritual strength, from panic to tranquillity, from dereliction to a foretaste of immortality.

As Fr. Richard Conrad has insisted, although the sacrament of the sick does not always result in healing, this does not mean it does not always work. For all the sacraments are sacraments of hope: they point us forward to the kingdom, and enable us to lay hold of it.[34] Part of their action is deferred. In baptism we rise with Christ spiritually; we rise physically in the power of our baptism only at the end of time. (Even spiritually, we are not set free from the world, the flesh, and the devil straight away, but are enabled to withstand these so as to share Christ's victory over them more personally.) The Eucharist is in the words of Ignatius of Antioch the "medicine of immortality," but we still have to die before we can fully enjoy the life it brings.

The sacrament of the sick brings healing, but only does so for certain when the body that was anointed rises to a life beyond sickness. Anointing is linked to the resurrection of the body, just as at Bethany the Lord's body was anointed for its destiny: to die and be buried so as to overcome death and rise in glory. Thus the holy anointing passes into the commendation of the dying, with its climax in the great Profiscere prayer of the Roman liturgy.

Go, Christian soul! Depart from this world, in the name of God the almighty Father, who created you; in the name of Jesus Christ, Son of the living God, who suffered death for you; in the name of the Holy Spirit, who has been poured forth upon you; in the name of Mary, God's holy and glorious virgin-mother; in the name of her great consort, blessed Joseph; in the name of the Angels and Archangels, of Thrones and Dominations, of Principalities and Powers, of Virtues, Cherubim, and Seraphim; in the name of the Patriarchs and prophets, of the holy apostles and evangelists, of the holy martyrs, confessors, monks, and hermits, of the holy virgins, and of all the saints of God. In peace be your home this day and in holy Sion your abode: through the same Christ our Lord. Amen.

Fortified by the last Holy Communion food for a journey, in Latin viaticum, in Greek ephodion the faithful receive the Church's parting gift to the dying: a pledge of future glory that will give way before the eternal sacrament of the glorified humanity of Christ.

6. Orders

Orders is the sacrament whereby, through incorporation in the original ministry of the apostles, men come to share, not only in the royal and universal priesthood of all the baptized, entered by baptism and confirmation, but the ministerial or serving priesthood which aims to equip the members of the Church with the graces that flow from Christ as head upon his body, his people. Although those who share in orders are properly called bishops, presbyters, and deacons, the office of the first two groups (assisted by the third) is known not only as the "apostolic ministry" but also as "the priesthood."

For the Letter to the Hebrews, Christ is our great high priest whose work on the Cross has superseded the priesthood of Israel. By his sacrificial death Jesus is more truly and profoundly a priest than the priests of old. From the first moment of the incarnation to the ascension, and now for ever in heaven, he is the source of all priesthood. Moreover, this priesthood can be shared. If the Church is the "fullness of him who fills all in all," the body of Christ, then she must be included in his priesthood. And so the New Testament sees her: as "a royal priesthood" (1 Pet 2:9), "a kingdom and priests to God" (Rev 1:6). Catholicism finds here, as we have had occasion to note in the ecclesiological chapter of this book, two distinct ecclesial ways of sharing the priesthood of Christ. Interrelated and coordinated, they are nonetheless different in kind. The election of the Twelve and their consecration marks out the ministerial leadership of the Church as called to share in Christ's priesthood not simply through baptism the foundation of membership of the Church but in a sacrament specially devoted to the hierarchical structure of this people's Church: holy orders. The Twelve share Christ's priesthood because they share in his apostolate, his sending by the Father. They are chosen and consecrated for extending and continuing the mission of the Son in a public way. The Letter to the Hebrews calls Jesus "the apostle and high priest of our profession" (3:1), and the Gospel of John brings out the direct causal link between the sending of the Son and the Son's sending of the apostles:

"As thou didst send me into the world, so I have sent them into the world" (17:18).

At the Last Supper, in commanding the Twelve to "do this" (a sacrificial term in itself in both pagan usage and the Septuagint) in remembrance of him (against its Jewish background, not human recollection but God's remembering, a divine action), Jesus bestows on the Twelve an active oblationary share in his priesthood. He empowers them to make present his sacrifice, efficacious for salvation, until he comes again. In the farewell discourse of the Fourth Gospel (the "high priestly prayer," which replaces, in John, the scene of the institution of the Eucharist in the Synoptics), the apostles are presented as sharing the dignity and destiny of the incarnate Son as priestly intercessor and consecrated apostle of the Father. "All mine are thine, and thine are mine, and I am glorified in them" (17:10).

Special droits de cité in the kingdom of Christ are, however, purely for the building up of that city and realm in its fullness. The Lord constituted his Church with a hierarchy within her so that the entire Church might become what she is called to be. The Council of Trent remarks of the Holy Eucharist that the Church celebrates by the hands of her priests: and here the Church can only be that great sacrament, the Lord's spouse, the totality of the people of God as a structured assembly.

If the New Testament then refuses the title hiereus to Christian ministers, this is not a denial of the priestly character of their ministry, but an attempt to avoid confusing it with that of the priests of the old covenant (and a fortiori, those of pagan religion). The Christian ministry is essentially apostolic: as such it can only be a "sacramentalization" of the one effective priest, Christ the Redeemer, whose death and resurrection the minister proclaims and actualizes in ritual. The apostolic college and thus the sacrament of orders is fundamental to the Catholic view of the Church. As Paul insists, in the Church as in the human body, the sign of organic life is organized structure, the diversification and coordination of parts. An undifferentiated Church could not be Christ's mystical body. Moreover, the place of the apostles in particular is, for the New Testament, indispensable: they are the foundation of the household of God (Eph 2:20) which is, therefore, not only a differentiated but a hierarchical assembly.

The apostles are not "extras" in the drama of redemption, nor are they simply narrators; the institution of their college is itself part of the dramatic action, willed by God; their ministry is itself part of the economy of salvation. Jesus' appointment of the twelve, and their special consecration at Pentecost, are not functional devices, otherwise irrelevant to the preaching of the Kingdom and the redemptive work of Christ; no, it is precisely through these men, and through the Spirit who will indwell them and guide them, that the Lord's words and work will be communicated.[35]


The Second Vatican Council speaks of the bishop's sharing in the apostolic offices of teacher, priest, and shepherd as one of the great Pentecostal gifts of the risen Christ to his Church.

For the discharging of such great duties the apostles were enriched by Christ by a special outpouring of the Holy Spirit who came upon them. . . . This spiritual gift they passed onto their helpers by the imposition of hands.... Christ whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world ... has, through His Apostles, made their successors, the bishops, partakers of His consecration and His mission. [36]

Through what has been called "apostolic simultaneity," the sacrament of orders is a direct sharing in the mystery of Pentecost. Not secondhand but directly do the bishops participate in that meta-event, thanks to the working of the one Spirit in the Church.

"The extension of the apostolate and high priesthood to bishops is part of a God-created pattern, at the centre of which is the Paraclete. The fathers see a typological sequence in which the one Spirit descends upon Jesus at the Jordan, on the apostles at Pentecost, and on the bishop at his ordination."[37]

The content of the bishop's office is well summed up in its consecration prayers at the ordination Mass. Those of the Armenian Rite will serve as well as any to illustrate this. The chief consecrator begins by summoning forth the candidate and praying for him with the laying-on of hands (the ancient, apostolic ordination gesture):

The divine and the heavenly grace that always provides for the ministry of the Apostolic church calls the priest . . . to the episcopate according to his own testimony and that of this people.

I place my hands upon him and do you all pray that he may purely maintain the degree of the episcopate before the holy altar of the Lord.

I thank you, the only-begotten Son of God, our Lord and Redeemer Jesus Christ, who have visited all mankind which is the work of your hands. You were sent into the world by God's will, to seek and save those who were lost. You humbled yourself to share our nature. You saved us from the condemnation due our sins by your Passion on the Cross. You subdue our enemy, and by renewing us from the ancient corruption, have shown us the new and holy way to eternal life, through your Resurrection. As you were sent by the Father, so you sent your Apostles. You gave them courage to preach to all peoples, inspiring them by your powerful Spirit with the promise to stay with them always till the end of the age. To them you never cease to raise up heirs and successors on the thrones of your holy Church, to shepherd and defend the rational flock which you purchased by your precious and life-giving blood. Accept, good Lord, the prayers of us your servants who are gath­ered here before you and implore your favour for this your servant whom you have chosen and called by grace to the office and dignity of the episcopate.

The rite asks more specifically for gifts equipping the bishop-elect to teach the faith, to convert the vicious and confirm the virtuous, to celebrate the sacraments worthily (especially the "wonderful mystery of the [Eucharistic] sacrifice"), and not to ordain deacons and presbyters hastily or inadvisedly. The bishop is to be a pattern of observance of the commandments and virtues of Scripture, and to pray and keep vigil for the salvation of the people entrusted to him. He will inherit the apostles' authority to absolve sins, "opening the door of heaven to those who come to you through him," to be a father to orphans, widows, and the poor.

The consecrator proceeds to anoint the head and hands of the candidate, asking that he may receive a share in the Pentecostal mystery:

"Lord, may the unction poured out plentifully on the head of your elect run abundantly throughout his body. Through the strength of your Holy Spirit in him may it abound in his heart. May he keep himself always constant in the faith and in love of the truth."

As he hands over the pastoral staff, he says,

"Receive this crosier and staff of the dignity of pastor, with which you will judge the wicked with justice and severity, and pasture and feed at all times those obedient to the law and the commandments of God."

Next, the ring is given:

"Receive this ring as a sign of faithfulness and keep yourself prudent in your divine wedding with holy Church by right faith."

Placing the pectoral cross around his neck, the main consecrator then hands over to the newly ordained the book of the Gospels, with the words,

"Receive now the Gospel and go and preach to the people committed to you by God; may almighty God increase them by his grace, and reign over them to the ages of ages."

The conferral of the mitre, the bishop's headdress, is accompanied by a prayer to the Father:

Lord, we place on this bishop's head the helmet of strength and salvation, so that his face, adorned and formidable by the power of the New Testament, as of the Old, may appear terrible to the opponents of truth, and smite them vigorously with the grace you will grant him as once you impressed on the countenance of Moses, resplendent from his converse with you, the radiant authority of your light and truth, and ordered the mitre to be set on the head of your high priest Aaron.

Lastly, the consecrating bishop puts on the breast of his new brother the omophorion, which corresponds to the pallium of the West, a sign of communion with the rest of the episcopate, and notably, for Catholics, with the pope:

"For the glory and honour of almighty God, and of the most holy, ever-virgin Mary, and of the blessed saints Peter and Paul, and for our holy father pope . . . of the holy Roman church, and for the church of . . . we bestow upon you the omophorion, which signifies the plenitude of the priestly ministry."

This rich symbolism, embodying high doctrine, is only comprehensible if, in the words of Lumen gentium,

"By divine institution bishops have succeeded to the place of the apostles as shepherds of the Church, and. . . he who hears them hears Christ, while he who rejects them rejects Christ and him who sent Christ."[38]

That statement is made of course not of an individual bishop as such, but only as such a one is conjoined in mind and heart with the whole episcopal college which has the Roman bishop, the universal primate, as its head.


Whereas the deacon is ordained as the bishop's servant, in ministerio episcopi, the presbyter shares his priesthood. Together liturgically as a corona, "crown," surrounding him the presbyters form with the bishop, the primary sacerdos, one priestly body, helping him in the governance of the Church. But while the ensuring of spiritual discipline and orthodoxy of faith (shepherding and teaching) must count high among a presbyter's duties, if indeed he shares, through and with the bishop, in the apostolic ministry, nonetheless the special priestly offering of the Eucharistic sacrifice takes pride of place. Indeed, for presbyters commonly called, simply, "priests" who are contemplative monks, it may be the only tangible expression of ministerial priesthood.

It is not that the sacrifice is simply superior to the Word; it is rather that the sacrifice is itself the supreme preaching of the Gospel, not just in the sense that every Eucharist contains the liturgy of the Word, but because it is precisely the Christ really, substantially present in the Eucharist, offered and offering himself in the oblation, the Christ who pours himself out unceasingly in the Blessed Sacrament, whom we preach to the nations.[39]

It was the Donatist crisis that helped the western Church to formulate the doctrine of the opus operatum, the objective existence and influence of grace within a priest despite his unworthiness. Though the grace of orders does not require us to make a cult of failure (for God wants us to make good use of his gifts), it nonetheless challenges us to keep our eyes fixed on Christ crucified and to be configured to him.

When a priest, groaning within himself at the thought of his unworthiness and the sublimity of his functions, has put his consecrated hands on our heads; when, humiliated to find himself the dispenser of the Blood of the Covenant, amazed on each occasion to utter the words which give life when, a sinner himself, he has absolved a sinner, we ourselves, rising from before his feet, realise that we have suffered no indignity. We have been at the feet of a man who represented Jesus Christ. . . . We have been there to gain the characteristics of free men and God's children.[40]

The grace of orders is nonetheless given for the cultivation of holiness. For that grace to show itself in its true glory, it must be accompanied by the cooperation of the priest's will, and that means his unrelenting pursuit of holiness of life through ascesis and spiritual combat, which in turn means unceasing prayer and thanksgiving, regular self-examination and confession, fasting, abstinence, and the conquest of personal sin. A priest's life and ministry can have no fruitfulness unless he acknowledges the priority of the glory of God in all he does and is.

The privileged contiguity of the priest to the sacrifice of Christ imposes on him the obligation to lead a sacrificial life. Paul defined the apostolate as the capacity to be wasted, poured out on behalf of the Church, seeing there its Christological configuration and thus its hidden fruitfulness. The poet Paul Claudel replied, in April 1945, to a young curé de campagne who had written to tell him of his sense of spiritual isolation. After mentioning his own experiences of isolation in a diplomat's life abroad, Claudel explained:

Thanks be to God: study and prayer enabled me to cross those desolate zones which lead to Horeb, the mount of God. However, it seems to me that, in your own part of the world, you have resources which I did not. The Mass which you say each morning pours out a torrent of inestimable, incommensurable blessing not only on your village but on all humanity. It empties Purgatory. And then each morning, as you awake, you can tell yourself that these men, women, children, have been specially entrusted to you by God himself. To others he gave cows or horses; to you these immortal souls. You are their Christ, able to give them life, fully invested with a power of vivification, illumination, resurrection. You immolate yourself for them each day on the altar. You have an inside knowledge of what is deepest in them and of what is unknown to them but what makes them who they are. You are the agent of their guardian angels. You stand in for them. In this sublime role, what do human contretemps and contradictions count? Were you promised a paper cross? Or a good honest heavy cross, which is just your size, precisely because it appears overwhelming? Besides the immense divine joy reserved for you, and whose dispenser you are, how simply ridicu­lous these little pebbles in your shoes appear.

Believe me, the vocation of a priest, and I would add of a country priest (our Lord was a country priest) is the sublimest of all. That of writer pales in comparison. Deus illuminatio mea, quem timebo? ["God is my light, whom shall I fear?" (Psalm 27:1)] [41]

Like the bishop everywhere, the presbyter in the Latin Church is, with few exceptions, celibate. Sexuality is a divine blessing on, specifically, this life, whereas the priest's primary concern lies in preparing people for the age to come. In the Eastern Churches, where a married presbyterate coexists with a celibate or monastic one, this point is af­firmed in the canonical requirement of abstinence from intercourse in the time before celebration of the (non-daily) Eucharist.

Minister of reconciliation and of the Eucharist, man of doctrine and prayer: the priesthood of the presbyter has an amazing concentration of representative significance, gathering up as it does so many of the roles of the whole Church. Its pattern includes most importantly the following elements     

1. Evangelizing the unconverted

2. Teaching sound doctrine in faith and morals to the converted

3. Forming others to be apostolic

4. Celebrating the sacraments, and other rites of the Church

5. In particular, by the celebration of penance and the Eucharist, bringing the paschal mystery to bear on the lives of the faithful, who die to sin, and live with Christ to God

6. In the Mass, but also in the Divine Office, acting as intercessor for the Church, and for all creation

7. In union with the bishop, and, ultimately, with the pope, to build up, as pastor, the communion of the Church, gathering the faithful and opening them to the fullness of the Church's life

8. Visiting, and so counselling and encouraging, individual members of the Church community especially the sick and the poor

9. Overseeing the community's wider attempt to meet the needs of its members, and of the wider realm in which their lives are set. [42]

In that last regard, the priest will naturally find himself in relation to the deacon. But before moving on to look at the diaconate, some few words must be added about the non-ordaining of women to the ministerial priesthood in the Catholic Church.

The two figures which must be displayed in any church building where the Christian people gather to celebrate the mysteries are the crucified Christ and the mother of God. The ministerial priest, iconic in his male gender, stands for the one; the people, symbolized as mother Church, find expression in the other. While Jesus Christ is the Savior of all human beings, men and women, Mary is our mother, and notably the mother of the members of Christ's Church-body. In the typological and iconic experience of worship, and of the Christian life, the mother of God presents Christians before the Lord's throne; in the one who gave human flesh to the Son of God they find a ready help and intercessor. Mary represents the whole people of God in relation to their Lord. The ministerial priest, by contrast, iconically presents to this body of Christ her head and Lord, the high priest Jesus Christ. This distinction belongs at the deepest level to the ethos and inner tradition of Church, such that all challenge to it disturbs the interrelation of Christology on the one hand, and, on the other, Mariology, ecclesiology, and (ultimately) pneumatology. The choice, use, and combination of images made by Christ and the Spirit must be a supernatural work, or else Christianity is an illusion. Among analogical forms in Catholicism, none are more influential than those which make use of the imagery of sexual differentiation, above all those which refer to God as Father and Christ as bridegroom of the Church. The maleness of the hierarchical priesthood is one vital way in which these great images are preserved in the Church. There is no question here of Jewish male chauvinism in the Lord's non-selection of women for the Twelve, much less any ascription of moral superiority to men. One has only to think of the comparative performance, on Calvary, of the Twelve and of the women disciples. What is at stake is, rather, a symbolic and ritual-dramatic significance in the polarization of man and woman within the group of the Messiah's followers. The fruitful tension of Christological and Marian principles must be structured in the life of the Church: it must, that is, find expression in a sacrament. The ministerial priesthood is the efficacious sign of the new Adam, with the bishop or priest at the altar imaging Christ the bridegroom. (It is also true that the very maleness of Christian priests guards a continuity between the two covenants, where the president at Passover was always male: a female Messiah could not have fulfilled the Exodus tradition.)

Woman becomes one with man not when she is and does all that man is and does, but when her womanliness and its distinctive charisms are acknowledged by man and integrated with his own. There are many tasks of a ministerial nature open to Catholic women along these lines: education, from elementary school to university; pastoral counselling; preparation for marriage, baptism, and confirmation; youth work, social service, especially with the sick and the deprived; iconographic and musical work. Some women may feel called to a full­time service of the Church in these ways not as vowed religious but in the form of specifically lay diakonia; the ancient order of deaconesses could well be revived in that context.


The deacon is ordained above all for the assistance of the bishop. The Syrian Didascalia Apostolorum describes him as the bishop's mouth, ear, and heart. Deacons were, historically, approached on routine matters so that the bishop would not be continually interrupted. Owing to their position of confidence they sometimes-and especially at Rome considered themselves superior to simple presbyters. But the normal rule is that the deacons are also at the service of presbyters whenever the bishop considers it desirable.

The deacons of the Church are ordained so as to represent Christ in the role of servant: serving the Father and serving human beings. Ignatius of Antioch calls them servants of the bishop as Christ is of the Father, and thus stewards of the diakonia of Jesus himself. They prepare the table of the Eucharistic feast in the liturgy, but they also act as go­betweens, joining the ministerial priest in the sanctuary to the common people of God in the nave, in the Byzantine Rite, and communicating, in the litanies for which that rite makes them responsible, the world's needs to the Church of saints and angels represented on the iconostasis. In the West, Prudentius calls them the "columns on which God's altar rests"; through them, the hierarchy of bishop and priest finds itself in loser contact with the world and the legitimate temporal concerns which are also germane to the making of the kingdom of God.

7. Marriage

In the Book of Genesis, marriage is presented as given in the very moment when God creates male and female in his own image and likeness. It images, then, something of God himself. As the revelation contained in Scripture unfolds, it transpires that this "something" is in fact the capacity for love in interpersonal relationship and its fruitfulness. However, marriage, like all human things, was soon distorted. With the Fall, that primordial going astray at the beginning of our race, marriage too fell; we see the emergence even within Israel, the chosen people, of such practices as polygamy and divorce. Yet, as the Old Testament presents it, marriage never lost the blessing of God. It remained a vehicle of relationship with him; even more, though a natural reality, it was spoken of by the prophets as a lived metaphor the Bride, Israel, and her Bridegroom for God's seeking out his people. In other words, it tended toward the sacramental order, the order of incarnational friendship with God, which Christians are privileged to share.

The Redeemer of marriage, as of all the other constitutive dimensions of human life, is Jesus Christ. With the incarnation, the union begins of "things in heaven and things on earth" (Col 1:20). The Gospels present Jesus as the bridegroom awaiting his bride the human race provisionally embodied, as long as time lasts, in the Church. In word and deed, the bridegroom reveals what the Letter to the Ephesians describes as his "great mystery" (5:32). As prophet Jesus reveals the new kind of marriage to be practiced among his people, an indissoluble marriage based on the gracious origins of humankind, a restoring of the original creation. As priest (or rather, priest-and-victim, for the sacrifice which the God-man offers on Golgotha is himself), Jesus, goes up to Jerusalem, there to die for his spouse, offering his consent at the supper table and promising to take her to himself. From there his wedding procession leaves for the place of the actual celebration: Calvary. As in the medieval rood-screens, Mary, the mother of Jesus, and John, the beloved disciple the two great personifications of the coming Church act as the bridegroom's attendants, and the witnesses to the wedding. On the cross, the bridegroom dies for the Church his spouse, who is thus born from his pierced side, since human beings are reborn, accepted and cleansed, in that nuptial self-immolation of God's own Son, becoming one with him who loved us and gave himself for us. As king, Christ reveals in his resurrection that these nuptials of the Cross bring about a complete union between human beings and God for all eternity. By his royal power, as Lord of all, he draws those of the baptized who marry into the sphere of his own marriage covenant, enabling them to experience the nuptial meaning of their own bodies as sacraments of his sacrificial love for his bride, the Church. The baptized who marry as members of Christ's mystical body are thus consecrated by their act of mutual consent. They receive the Spirit of the Father and the Son who joins them together in the marriage bond. They are strengthened by a grace conditioned to their new state, helping them to make the love of Christ, crucified and risen, a present reality, sanctifying one another in the suffering and joy of daily life.

Without this high doctrinal background, it is impossible to understand the demands and specificities of the Catholic understanding of marriage and sexuality. That understanding cannot be set forth in simply pragmatic and empirical terms as though it were purely a matter of one particular presentation of the facts of human psychology. The reason why indissolubility is an integral aspect of the sacrament of marriage is, in the last analysis, that the union between God and humanity cannot be broken. Christ cannot separate from his Church. Divorce, in this context, is not so much a sin as a lie. Similarly, adultery is a falsification of the "one flesh" by (in the context) simulated self­giving. Again, the use of artificial rather than natural methods of birth control can be said to substitute technical control for the personal control which befits the eminently personal character of the marriage covenant.

Catholic married couples, and other married Christians who share this fundamental understanding, are not, therefore, the last bastions of a Victorian concept of sex and family. They are prophets, priests, and kings; the acting images of Christ the bridegroom and his bride; united to the power of his glorious Cross, journeying together towards the kingdom, the everlasting wedding banquet of the Lamb of God.

The conditions of a valid marriage are implied in the wedding rites of the Catholic Church. The couple are asked to undertake the fulfillment of three conditions. First, the marriage must be open to new life, that is, the couple must be willing to procreate and nurture children. (Couples where one partner or both are childless may still marry, but on the understanding that if ethically acceptable means of overcoming infertility are available, they will make use of them.) Second, a marriage must be permanent, abiding until the death of one partner or both. Third, the union must be "exclusive": this relationship is only possible if it has a unique recipient.

These specify, as it were, the minimum conditions of the marriage covenant which the sacramental order then elevates to be a medium of the grace of the incarnation. For in the first place, the basis of marriage lies in the created order which is why the Catholic Church claims the right, as the accredited interpreter of that order, to counsel the state on the form of law conducive, in these matters, to the common good. The "Genetic" account of marriage shows Adam receiving Eve as his "helpmate": she brings him complementarity, draws him out of loneliness and by mutual love each makes the other more himself or herself. Marriage is then for the sustaining of each partner. It is also for their task of co-creation, with God, of the new members of the human race. Companionate union is necessary for children to be born and brought up in a loving home; in these offspring, moreover, the couple re-discover themselves in a new way, as parents, the better to enhance their companionship. The Second Vatican Council's Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World calls children the ultimate crown of marriage, its most outstanding gift, and the greatest good bestowed on the parents. The spouses are to show forth the mystery of the fruitfulness as well as the unity that holds good between Christ and the Church.

Thanks to Christian initiation by baptism, a married couple share not only a natural, God-given covenant, but a sacrament of the Church. Incorporated in the redeeming work of Christ by baptismal regeneration, with its consequences (justification and sanctification), a man and a woman are now located within the new and everlasting "spousal" covenant of Christ and his Church. Marriage, with its call to self-giving love, acts as a sacrament of God's own love for humankind, as the prophet Hosea had already glimpsed in describing YHWH's union with Israel. More specifically, it is a sacrament of the love of God in Christ for the whole Church, as the Letter to the Ephesians so eloquently puts it (5:21-33). "Love one another as I have loved you" (Jn 13:34) is the new commandment of Christ on his way to Calvary. Marriage is a school of charity-love, entailing an overcoming of selfishness throughout one's life. Married love involves a deepening of both erotic love (the communion made possible by sexuality) and the love of friendship (made possible by shared interests and values). In the spirit of the marriage vows "for better, or worse; for richer, or poorer" the charity-love of marriage is a self-emptying, kenotic love, like that of Christ on the cross. It is, then, an unconditional commitment, which does not depend on one or the other remaining lovable, or even sane. One does not marry so as to reform, though love will of its nature reform and improve. Catholicism's opposition to divorce is not, then, a legalism, but an affirmation of the nature of true love. The other can only be truly loved by being continually forgiven until death do them part. (The Church recognizes judicial separation, "from bed and board," but not the concept of the irretrievable breakdown of marriage, and so of remarriage in the lifetime of a spouse. Given grace and providence, there is no total irretrievability.)

Like all sacraments, marriage is related not only to God's "crucial" work, the atonement, but also to what that work served: the mission of the Son now continued in his body, the Church. Marriage has a missionary task. This is directed first to the children. Father and mother are to minister Christ to the children in the whole of a life together. It must then extend beyond the children to a wider circle. The Christian family is a foyer, a radiating center of warmth and affection, into which the lonely, the troubled, the disadvantaged, and the poor should find an entry. The range of such hospitality is wide-befriending other families, welcoming newcomers, visiting the sick, helping single parents, etc., all come within its compass.

Like any sacrament, marriage has its ministers. On the overwhelmingly predominant Catholic view, these ministers are the couple themselves. The priest serves as a witness; if he cannot be located within a given period (as perhaps in Outer Mongolia, or the Antarctic), the couple may proceed to a fully sacramental union with lay witnesses instead.

Though the early liturgy of marriage is lost in the mists of scarcely documented time, in all probability it followed Jewish practice: betrothal leading to marriage, with the making of contract, all taking place by a domestic ritual, presumably with some version of the talmudic seven blessings, as appears to be the case in the third-century Syriac text the Acts of Thomas. In the medieval West, domestic rites (in the home or at the church gate) could both precede and follow the nuptial Mass. Commonly, there would be a domestic rite of consent, with the blessing of a ring (expressed in short pithy prayers, like those in the Anglo-Saxon pontifical of Egbert); a nuptial Mass, with a theologically fuller and indeed often florid prayer of nuptial blessing (one of the most ancient, that of the Gregorian Sacramentary, survives in the reformed Roman book of 1969); and then, at home again, the blessing of the bedchamber (and the couple). Although Scholastic theologians increasingly found the heart of marriage to lie in the exchange of vows, the act of consent (for consensus facit nuptias), the nuptial blessing constituted the liturgical high point, when the bridal pair were placed under a canopy (as in the Sarum Rite) or had a veil draped around their shoulders (as at Milan), both symbols of the Shekinah, or divine presence. In the Visigothic rites, they were bound by a special cord or golden chain. In the Eastern liturgies, the couple are crowned with wreaths of flowers or actual crowns of metal and stones. The East Syrian liturgy prays:

O Christ, adorned Spouse, whose betrothal has

given us a type,

complete the foundation and the building and

their [the couple's] laudable work;

sanctify their marriage and their bed;
and dismiss their sins and offences;
and make them a temple for you and bestow on their

marriage chamber your light;

and may their odour be as a roseshoot in paradise,

and as a garden full of scents,
and as a myrtle tree may be for your praise.

May they be a bastion for our orthodox band and

a house of refuge.

The Eastern Churches retain often elaborate rites of betrothal, with anointing (Maronite), the blessing of robes and jewels (Armenian), and the drinking of a cup of water, ash, and wine, to symbolize dying to a former life and rising to a new (East Syrian). The Order of Christian Marriage for England and Wales (1995) restores a form of betrothal rite for those who wish it, with blessing of the couple and the engagement ring, as well as the lighting of candles to symbolize the convergence of two families. The provision of liturgically marked states of approach to marriage is seen not as archaeological revival but as good pastoral practice which will, through ritual acts, however simple, bond the couple more closely to the Church's understanding of what marriage involves.

The grace of marriage may be expected to be especially fruitful in crises. Love ceases to blossom; it wilts; but grace gives resurrection, a new start, and its effect is cumulative over time.

The Church Building

The building in which these rites take place is evidently a special space for Christians. As the place where the sacrifice of our redemption is celebrated and its fruits received in the seven sacraments, where the word of God is heard and the Christ present in the Eucharistic tabernacle adored, and where all manner of extraliturgical devotions, expressive of the faith of the Church, are carried on, it is a different kind of place. In a special way it is the dwelling of God among us (Rev 21:3), the place where God guarantees he may be found by the faithful. It is our Father's house, God's "royal palace" (the "basilica"); it is the place where the ecclesial body of Christ is molded and developed, and hence is a living symbol of his own blessed body; it is the place where God's ultimate union with his people by the Spirit is anticipated, and so is the new Jerusalem come down from heaven (Rev 21:2). It is a place of escape from what is merely peripheral, where we occupy ourselves with what is fundamentally important. Its architecture reflects human nature in the image of God: passionate for clarity, and enlightenment, as also for peace and quiet, warmth and shelter. In the world-of late antiquity where the Catholic Church was born, churches were not, as one student has pointed out, "iconographical puzzles." Rather, they were

ho topos: the "place," where it was possible to share for a moment in the eternal repose of the saints in paradise. Light seems trapped in the churches. The blaze of lamps and gold mosaic recapture the first moment of Creation: "Dark chaos is fled away." They are heavy with incense, which brought into this world a touch of paradise, conceived as a mountain covered with trees in full bloom. Their floors even attempt to catch the same sense of ease and release from care that forms such a poignant theme in the private mansions of the great from Hellenistic, times up to the establishment of Islam and beyond: one church could even be described as a meadow blooming with flowers. In the northern Syrian church of Huarte, Adam sits with imperial serenity among the beasts in a paradise regained. Two churches, the one near the dangerous mountains of Isauria and the other set up by its bishop, "a man of subtle mind," in Apamea, a city with a tradition of philosophical leisure, have mosaics depicting the coming of the Kingdom of Peace among the wild animals scattered on the floor. Christians hoped to find in their shrines a "place of fulfilment and sweet perfume," the echo of a rest beyond the grave in what was still a very classical landscape-because it was a human and a Mediterranean one, "in a grassy place by refreshing waters, whence pain and suffering and groaning have fled."[43]

As stylistic epochs give way to each other, Hellenistic and Byzantine, Romanesque, Gothic and Renaissance, Baroque and Romantic, we sense a connection between the Church's theology, her mission, and her feeling for the arts more recently endangered, alas, by a functionalism which tends to the aniconic, without and within. Yet the Rite of Dedication of Church and Altar makes clear that the building is quintessentially an icon, achieved by way of a specifically architectural set of means (location, volume, massing, and working with the repertoire of earlier tradition in the new accents made available by materials and techniques of the present day).

The building of a church offers a wonderful opportunity to make, for the glory of God but also for the good of human beings, a thing of beauty in a world where there is so much ugliness, and to embody a symbol in a world where symbols are so largely forgotten. A house is but the night lodging of a pilgrim, whereas a church should be the reflection of eternal life and bliss.

A church is essentially a Mass-house, but owing to the organic character of the sacramental and ecclesial life, which flows from and surrounds the Holy Eucharist, a Catholic church contains more than simply the prerequisites of the Eucharistic celebration. The church tower (if it exists) may contain a bell or peal of bells, worked either by moving the bells, or moving the clappers (in which case the peal is known as a carillon). Alternatively a bell may be housed in a small building of its own, a campanile. Less essential today, in that we have docks and watches, the sound of the bell expresses in its own medium the summons of grace, while smaller bells are used in the worship of the Eucharist to give added solemnity to the moment of the consecration (at Mass) or blessing with the Host (at Benediction). A second space that is sometimes separate from the main church is the baptistery often round or octagonal, with the font surrounded by a railing. By the eighth century, in Western Europe at any rate, fonts were customarily resited just within the Church. By the thirteenth century the baptismal water was normally protected by a wooden lid. By the end of the Middle Ages the lid had been lovingly adorned with a spire, sometimes tall enough to reach the Church roof and worked by pulleys. Since the opening part of the baptismal liturgy takes place in the narthex or porch of a church it makes good sense to locate the font there, though nowadays, to permit congregational participation in some numbers at the climax of the rite of baptism, many fonts are relocated in the sanctuary. Since baptism is the "gate of the sacraments," this is not so congruent. If the font is not in the porch (or even if it is), a holy water stoup reminds the faithful entering the church of their own baptism: they take water, and make the sign of the Cross with it. By the nineteenth century, these stoups had become tiny niches in walls, surmounted by canopies. Earlier they could be much larger: the Renaissance Church favored vast shallow basins, frequently designed as shells.

The principal object to which the eye should be directed on entering the body of a church is the (high) altar. Early Christian altars were very small affairs, but gradually they underwent an expansion. Originally, nothing was placed on the "table of sacrifice" except the bread and wine, perhaps the book of the Gospels, and a small casket in which to place the consecrated elements for the communication of the sick. The expansion was due to a number of factors. First, when it became commonplace to "say" Mass rather than sing it, the epistle and gospel ceased to be chanted from ambos (the little pulpits in the early basilicas) and were read instead from two sides (ends) of the altar. Second, with the growth of popular devotion to the saints, reliquaries were placed behind, beneath, beside, and even upon the altars. In the Byzantine Rite, in which the altar is covered in silk or linen cloth embroidered with the instruments of the passion, the relic-bag (antimension) takes the place of the stone containers of the West. Sometimes an altar would have a retable, a decorated screen adorning a fixed platform behind the altar. From that there developed the higher reredos, sometimes a wonder work of statuary, which grew throughout the late medieval and early modern period until by the eighteenth century it filled the entire rear wall of the Church. Though the modern tendency is to reemphasize, by simplifying the surroundings, the starkness of the altar, it must still have a small cavity in which the relics of the saints are placed. It must also be related to an image of the crucified Savior; other images, of our Lady and the saints, are also appropriate in its near vicinity as a reminder of the entire worshipping Church made present in the liturgy.

Also highly prominent in a Catholic church is the tabernacle where the Blessed Sacrament is reserved. The earliest tabernacles appear to be in the form of a kind of small tower, on the gospel side of the sanctuary. Later there were metal doves suspended above the high altar, or a pyx (a kind of veiled chalice), or a small cupboard built into the lower part of the reredos. The modern tabernacle has evolved as a combination of the tower and the cupboard. It is covered in a veil, usually of silk, brocade, or damask, to signify the preciousness of its contents and the divine presence which is thus both concealed and revealed. The veil, in Latin tabernaculum, gives the sacrament house its name.

Candles were originally placed around the altar, having been carried there in procession. But by the twelfth century we find two candlesticks placed on the altar table itself for the whole of Mass. Later this was extended to six for high Mass (and seven when the pope was celebrating, or a bishop in his own diocese). The Dominican use retains the custom of lighting an extra candle during the Canon of the Mass.

The altar must be clothed: the antependium or frontal, hanging down at the front and the sides, is the most ancient furnishing for the altar. In the Byzantine Rite and other Eastern Churches it is close­fitting, of brocade or silk. Except in Rome, frontals in the West tended to disappear in the Renaissance, being replaced by carving or sculpture. In addition there are linen or hemp cloths of white: classically two to cover the altar table and a third, the topmost, to hang down on both ends.

An altar is also frequently dignified by a canopy, either free standing (a "civory") or suspended from roof or wall ("baldaquin"). The oldest known is at Ravenna, the best known is Bernini's 1633 baroque civory at St. Peter's, in Rome.

Required for the service of the altar are the sacred vessels and vestments. The chalice (for the wine) and paten (for the bread) are the most important of the former. In the Byzantine Rite the paten is surmounted by the asterikos, consisting of a crossed arch of two curved bands of precious metal, to prevent the veil touching the holy bread. A small spoon is used to give Communion while a metal knife (the lance) cuts the altar bread prepared as the liturgy opens. The ciborium, a sort of covered chalice, holds the consecrated bread in the tabernacle; when the sacrament is carried to the sick it is placed in a small round box, the pyx. If the carrying is by way of public worship and witness it is done in a monstrance, a kind of portable shrine; since the sixteenth century the usual tower type has been replaced by a sun shape, surrounded by rays.

Two kinds of vestments are used in the celebration of Mass. First, there are outer garments, made normally of silk: the chasuble, a tent­like garment (Latin casula, "little house") for the bishop or priest; the dalmatic, a robe with wide sleeves, originally made of Dalmatian wool, for the deacon; the tunicle, a simplified dalmatic, for the sub­deacon or, in the modem Roman liturgy, the cross-bearer; the stole, a scarf symbolizing the priestly office; and the maniple, a liturgical handkerchief, now confined to the older uses of the Roman Rite. Second, there are the linen garments worn underneath: the amice, a head-covering; the alb, a long white garment with close-fitting sleeves; and a girdle or cord. On special occasions, the sacred ministers (which in this case can include non-clerics, such as cantors) may use the cope a semi-circular cloak called in Latin pluviale (literally, a raincoat) intended to give solemnity to festal occasions. A bishop wears a ceremonial hat called a mitre, originally a soft round cap, but now shield-shaped, and carries a crosier, a crook-shaped staff, as the emblem of his pastoral (shepherding) authority. The design of these garments and objects differs significantly in the Oriental Catholic liturgies, although occasionally there has been borrowing from the Latin Rite.

These special clothes and symbolic objects are not necessarily confined to a church building, for the procession a characteristic feature of the public life of a Catholic culture takes them out of doors. A Church

"must be potentially and occasionally processional, must show itself for worship and jubilee in the open, must at times be peregrinating and agoral, and wind, in rich pomps and gauds, through market-place, street and town. Pomps and gauds, chanting and sweet smells, ceremonious adoration and mystery if these be not the fit circumstance and habit of worship, the worshipping world has for many thousands of years erred."[44]


33. Catechismus ex decreto Concilii Tridentini 2.6, 9.

34. R. Conrad, The Catholic Faith: A Dominican's Vision (London, 1995) 182.

35. J. Saward, "Priesthood, Suffering and Sacrifice," Christian 4 (1977) 33.

36. Lumen gentium, 21, 28.

37. Saward, "Priesthood," 34.

38. Lumen gentium, 20.

39. Saward, "Priesthood," 36.

40. A. Manzoni, "Osservazioni sulla morale cattolica," 18, in Opere (Milan, 1965) 1143-44.

41. Apart from the volumes of published correspondence, chiefly with literary figures, the Archives Paul Claudel contain many unedited items testifying to what Sr. Isabelle Bouchard had called his letter-writing "apostolate": L'expérience apostolique de Paul Claudel, d'après sa correspondence (Montreal, 1969).

42. I take this precis from A. Nichols, Holy Order: The Apostolic Ministry from the New Testament to the Second Vatican Council (Dublin, 1990) 142-43.

43. P Brown, "Art and Society in Late Antiquity," in The Age of Spirituality: A Symposium, ed. K. Weitzmann (New York, 1980) 25, with internal citations of an anonymous ancient Latin Christian inscription, the Miracula sancti Demetrii, and the Coptic Liturgy of St. Basil.

44. R. Macaulay, Personal Pleasures (London, 1935; 1968) 101.

©; 1996 by The Order of St. Benedict, Inc., Collegeville, Minnesota. All rights reserved.

This version: 6th February 2008

Home Page

Fr Aidan Nichols

Home Page